achieving economic, social & environmental development of our rural areas by building demand for high speed rural broadband through advice, support & advocacy
In the run up to the 2011 election, it seems clear that broadband in rural New Zealand has been forgotten about by the political parties.
Neither the Labour nor Green parties have specific and actionable policies to ensure that rural New Zealand participates in the coming digital society. The Maori party have some great policies but they are aimed at Maori.
National think they have done all that is required for infrastructure and those living in urban areas will benefit from fibre-to-the-home with no connection cost. However those living in rural areas are, by government policy, facing a new urban/rural digital divide based on those who have ultra fast broadband and those who do not. This is despite Mr Key’s principle of 'equal opportunity of access' stated in Monday night's election debate on TV1.
So what specific and actionable policies might the government adopt so that rural New Zealanders have the opportunity for equal access to the digital society?
Last week Rural Connect looked at the Labour Party's Information and Communications Technology (ICT) policy around the convergence of broadcasting and telecommunications and the need therefore, for new regulations.
We considered that the need for regulation covering technical aspects of broadcasting via the Internet no longer existed, leaving only content as an area to regulate. We argued that content regulation could cover only censorship and access to Internet sites which are areas where governments ought not be involved.
This week, we continue with a look at the Labour Party's ICT policies and check out the policies of the National, Maori and Green parties.
With the Rugby World Cup in its final week we are now starting to see political parties winding up for the elections in just five weeks.
The New Zealand Labour Party has this week released their policy on Information and Communication Technology (ICT). What a self-blinkered document it is, full of "investigating ways" and "independent reviews", lacking in specific actions that could have differentiated the Labour Party in this important area. More importantly, the policy provides no recognition of the hegemony of corporate control of ICT infrastructure that has resulted in the need for government subsidies to telecommunications providers.
The policy covers three main areas and a number of minor ones.
The first main area is about the convergence of broadcasting and telecommunications.
Does community ownership of infrastructure items like electricity generators and broadband fibre cable have a future in New Zealand? Here is how it works in the UK.
Net neutrality is an issue that, despite being contentious internationally, does not have a big profile in New Zealand. Unknown to most, our individual usage of the Internet is today determined by the net neutrality policy of service providers and the government. In some cases, that policy is good for society, in others, it is good for the service provider.
A definition of egalitarian: "Affirming, promoting, or characterized by belief in equal political, economic, social, and civil rights for all people."
As Minister of Communications and Information Technology, has Mr Steven Joyce considered principles of an egalitarianism in his world-leading telecoms reforms? It appears not.
Since his election to parliament as a list MP in 2008, Mr Joyce has achieved a shift in New Zealand's telecommunications industry. This was not a seismic shift - the opportunity for that was lost towards the end of the Ultra Fast Broadband (UFB) process when the contract was awarded to Telecom.
He gave a hint of hoped-for major transformations when holding out Telecom to the threat of competition in infrastructure provisioning. But that applied only in urban areas, so no concept of egalitarianism there.
